Global Beliefs logo


Site Map. Click [+] to expand.  Inspect Symbol

Click 'More' for more detail,
     'Next Page' (right arrow), or
    'Quick Tour' (control right arrow).

If in a drill down:
     you can use Shift-Down or Shift-Up,
     or Ctrl-Shift up or down to exit.

If looping over a theme:
     you can use Shift-Right or Shift-Left, or
     Ctrl-Shift-Left or Right to exit.

When the option is available,
using Alt key toggles the option:
     Alt-a - audio,
     Alt-i - iconic menu,
     Alt-m - music,
     Alt-v - video.

View notes for page: Ctrl-Up.
Return to main page: Ctrl-Down


What do you think?
Click Feedback to email us or have your say at the end of most pages.



Acknowledge coding help from:
W3Schools: Best free web coding tutorials.
StackOverflow
Flaticon
ExtendsClass - PHP syntax checker
Tree Menu Copyright (c) 2006 Mackley F. Pexton

User ID:
LFD= EN/EN/ SRC=Opt4Cur
LNM= EN TX#= '' SW#= ''
DVC= 'Dtop' BRS= 'Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)' SWF= 'AllWebSoftware'
SIT= 'GlobalBeliefs.org'
A= 'www.globalbeliefs.org'
RET= '' or ''
SLF= '/EN/4_0_v1_3.php' CUR= '4_0_v1_3'
NXT= '4_0'
MVM= '1,1' '1,1' '1,1'


Go Back Previous   Quick Back   Home Top Feedback Tenets   Quick Tour   Next
About  What's New   Help Us     Call Us     Members  Join  Lost Password  Log Out  

  • Languages

  • 4. RELIGION

    Version 1.3 March 2013                                                              (Previous Version)

    What use is religion? 

    Is it all just mumbo jumbo?  Is it relevant to us these days?  Many clever people just dismiss it.  Why shouldn’t we dismiss it too? 

    On the other hand, many clever people are very religious.  Are they right?

    All religions teach different things.  Don’t all religions contradict each other?  They can’t all be right.  Which one is best?  Or are all religions totally wrong? 

    Isn’t religion all based on faith, despite all the evidence to the contrary?

    Can we learn anything from “primitive” religions, those of indigenous peoples?  Is it worth trying to understand the sophisticated concepts of eastern religions?  Can any good come out of the competing western monotheistic religions?  What modern responses to religion are out there?

    We need to consider all of these questions before we can dismiss all religion.

    Religion is a minefield, but there is a safe path through it.

    Many people, even some religious leaders, have a very simplistic view of religion.  Some religious sceptics are contemptuous of religion, ignoring modern, rational approaches to religion.  An increasing number of us don't bother much about religion at all.  We all need to understand religion better if we are to promote peace in our communities and the world.  Religion also provides ways, for at least some of us, to express our deeper feelings and so called spirituality.

    We look at religion under these headings, to see what is worth learning from each area:

    Religious Methods and Practices:

    What do religions have in common?

    Is it reasonable to break down the study of religion into these five subject areas?

    Click on feedback, or add a comment below, to tell us if you agree or disagree, or suggest improvements.

    Indigenous Religions:

    What can we learn from the early religions?

    Eastern Religions:

    What can we learn from Eastern religions?

    Western Religions:

    What can we learn from Western religions?

    Modern Religion and Atheism:

    What can we learn from modern responses to the traditional religions?

    As we go through each of these areas, we realize there are many inconsistencies in religion, no religion is infallible, that religious stories about our origins are allegories, and rules made centuries ago must be revised to reflect our current world.  We can also see that many religious stories can be inspiring, regardless of their scientific or historical validity.

    • Many people believe that we get our values from god, or at least from religion.  We show in Part 1 that there is no reason to believe in God (Chapter 1.3 on Theology).  Even if there were a god, we also show that we still need to obtain our values independently of God – otherwise we would never know whether God was good or bad (Chapter 1.5 on Ethics).
    • But religion provides a wealth of ways to explore and express our values and our connection to the world, and we can benefit from this without becoming irrational.  We need to work out which aspects of religion promote our core values of truth, diversity, life, love, responsibility, equality and hope, and discard those aspects that don’t.

    Go Back GoBack Press (control) right, or click: Quick Tour  Quick Tour Next  Next

    Members can tell us (publicly) what they think of this page. How can we improve it? Enter your comments.
    Anyone can tell us (privately) what they think directly by email: click on 'Feedback' below.

    Your opinion of this page?

    *
    Public Comment (Optional):

    Be the first to add a comment on this page.

    * * * * * * *


    Go Back Previous   Quick Back   Home Top Feedback Tenets   Quick Tour   Next
    About  What's New   Help Us     Call Us     Members  Join  Lost Password  Log Out  

  • Languages

  • Global Beliefs Site logo

    We acknowledge the traditional owners and custodians of Country, throughout all colonised lands, and their connections to land, waters and community. We pay respect by giving voice to truth, values and social justice, acknowledging our shared history, and valuing the cultures of first nations peoples.

    Copyright © 2008 - 2026 Trevor J Rogers, care of the address shown on this page. All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the copyright owner. Any approved reproduction is permitted only with full attribution of the source, referring to this site and this copyright notice. The moral right of the author is asserted.

    Top